Subscribe via RSS Feed Network with Will on LinkedIn

Jet Blue’s Strategy Behind the All You Can Jet Pass

The Atlantic (which I absolutely love), posted their opinion of Jet Blue’s All You Can Jet pass, which suggested that it was designed for business travelers among other things. As much as I love them, I think The Atlantic got it completely wrong. I posted the comment below, but I thought it was worth reprinting here for posterity:

Daniel, I think you may have missed the mark on JetBlue’s intention with the “All You Can Jet” program. It is a publicity stunt designed to fill excess capacity without cutting into holiday revenues, but far from something designed for business travelers. It has consumer virtually written all over it. As it is designed, it offers little value to business travelers, but a great incentive for consumers to try out a ‘new’ airline.

1) While Jet Blue has been around for ten years now, I suspect that most leisure travelers have not tried them. This is for a variety of reasons including: i) Jetblue’s limited coverage, ii) consumers’ unwillingness to try an airline they have not flown before given an equally priced traditional option, iii) lack of transferable frequent flier points.

2) The three day advance booking does prevent it from being a cost saving device for last minute business travel, which is entirely fair. While large corporates are accustomed to lower costs for last minute travel than consumers, this policy sidelines them (another hint it is designed with consumers, not business travelers in mind). Consumers, on the other hand, are accustomed to low pricing power and being stuck with either astronomical last minute fares or a 21-day advance booking, replete with an expensive change fee for any modifications. The ability to change plans up to three days before seems like a godsend.

3) It was announced on Twitter before all other forums of media. In that ecosystem, the “All You Can Jet” pass (see #AYCJ ) has carefully been coaxed into a life of its own by the Jet Blue PR team. They are presently running an informal contest to see who can book the most extensive itinerary.

If this were designed for business travelers, there would have been some frontrunning by their PR department to work with corporate travel departments. That is clearly not the case.

4) Jet Blue has always been a consumer airline. When I worked for a Fortune 100 company three years ago, JetBlue was not even a corporate travel option regardless of the fair. Assuming they are ‘in the system’ now, you would have to go through many challenges to get the purchase of this pass approved even if you were saving 3x the cost.

Looking at their marketing like http://www.jetblue.com/about/whyyoulllike/ you can clearly tell that they are consumer oriented, and it suits them.

5) Purchasing the “All You Can Jet” pass requires that you sign up for Jet Blue’s frequent flier program. This essentially gives the company permission to market to you after the conclusion of your itinerary. If it were oriented towards business travelers, it seems like the loyalty program would be oriented towards becoming the business’s preferred airline rather then focusing on the actual passenger.

==

If Jet Blue’s goal is, as I believe, to generate publicity and to get more people to try out the airline, I think it will be very successful. The amount of press that this has generated is truly impressive; it is hard to put a dollar value on that.

I’ve been a content Jet Blue passenger for several years flying the AUS -> JFK route a number of times, but this promotion honestly changed my perception of the airline. It motivated me to actually spend hours analyzing their flight schedules to find interesting destinations. Even if I hadn’t booked the pass, the promotion created value for Jet Blue. I now know that they fly to Bogotá, Colombia among many other exciting destinations on Jet Blue. Can you realistically put a price on marketing that good?

Tags: , , ,

Category: Op-Ed

About the Author: Hello, I'm Will Dearman. I'm a data-focused consultant, aspiring strategist, and dad. I love experiments, big data, bigger ideas, adventures, and solving problems. I'm an INTJ. Find me on Twitter or Google+ If you liked this post, please subscribe to this blog.

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/ Taylor Davidson

    You're spot-on about @jetblue 's #AYCJ targeted customer segment, consumers, not business travelers.

    But the great thing is that the value created by the promotion, the mass of people pouring into JetBlue's schedule, is an asset that will stay in many people's minds for a long time; the cost of the promotion (lost revenue and marketing $$) a small price to pay for entering deeper into the consideration set for many people.

    And think of it in this term: JetBlue, empowering cool people to use their promotion to do cool stuff that other people would love to do? An airline as a force of good? Brilliant. I hope Jet Blue is working out ways to highlight people using the AYCJ (all-you-can-jet) pass and how they have used it to help their lives.

    It would be cool if you could have a special marker if you were a passenger flying on the AYCJ pass; a marker on a seat, a VIP badge, some kind of social object that fellow passengers could see, to create temporary rockstars on every plane with a AYCJ passenger.

    Can one put a $$ value on marketing that good? I'd hazard a guess Jet Blue is surely trying to :)

  • http://www.hellodelight.com matthewbward

    Good topic. One thing that I haven't seen talked about is the effect of this campaign at scale. I agree that this is a stunt designed to get slack out of the system, targeted at consumers, over a short period of time. Since the marginal cost of selling an empty seat is near zero, the economics of this campaign can probably be made to work out – either in current or expected revenues. But my question is what is the secondary effect of this promotion should it be taken to scale? Presumably, the demand created is mainly new demand and not demand transferred from other suppliers. Since this is a limited-time promotion, demand shifts will probably be temporary and soon return to normal. But if JetBlue offered this on an ongoing basis, how do you think competitors would respond? If successful, it seems like it would effect the oligopoly that the FAA maintains on routes and gates because you would see a fundamental shift in the system. It would have to create some sort of competitive response but I don't know what that would be. It seems like there is some game theory at work here but I'm not sure what it is. The same model could probably be applied to lots of other highly perishable, highly substitutable, low marginal costs business such as hotels and cars. Thoughts?

  • Alia

    Hi Sir,
    i read you essay about jetblue Airline http://thestrategyblog.com/index.php/archives/2
    and i like you way of analyzing the information.
    i am an MBA student and i have next week exam about jetblue airline case,
    through my preparation and reading for the exam , i come up with one question in my mind.
    What is the disadvantage of jetblue strategy ,,, it can continue in next years with the same success ?
    please help me to answer this question
    Thanks
    Alia

  • Alia

    Hi Sir,
    i read you essay about jetblue Airline http://thestrategyblog.com/index.php/archives/2
    and i like you way of analyzing the information.
    i am an MBA student and i have next week exam about jetblue airline case,
    through my preparation and reading for the exam , i come up with one question in my mind.
    What is the disadvantage of jetblue strategy ,,, it can continue in next years with the same success ?
    please help me to answer this question
    Thanks
    Alia